but sometimes it seems irrelevant. In fact

Recently, the frozen food brand company, three missing, Wan Chai Ferry Pier have "let the cat out of the bag": sampling and Staphylococcus aureus in foods containing health hazard. Push responsibility in law enforcement departments and responsibilities and related enterprise, query and enterprise in a public response to the game, quick-frozen food new national standards give cause for concern. According to the new national standard, bacterial detection of Staphylococcus aureus byTurn in quantitative, in other words, allows you to check out a small amount of Staphylococcus aureus in food, and the standards have been a number of companies quoted or even become a shield to prove qualified products. In the food security situation remains serious today, food safety standards are lower and lower? How to guarantee food safety? Interests of the consumers who will? Facing the public on the new national standard "clock"Doubts about the Health Department said misreading of new lower standards than the old standard, the new standards with international standards, more in line with international food Microbe sampling requirements. Whether the standard scientific and reasonable, I believe that through rational serious discussions, there will be a final answer. However, whenever a food safety incident, the public tends to eyes focused on "food safety standard", thenProvoking: should have a neutral objective safety standards, why have time and again raised public criticism challenged? ����If food safety standards have lost credibility, food safety and defense should from built up? Any standard, is a product of the times, should also keep pace with the, with the requirements of the times dovetails, and adapted to the development phase. However, one cannot avoid the fact that foodsBehind the frequent occurrence of security incidents, standard update lag food management in China, part of the standard long tread water, twenty or thirty years without change. ����In fact the old republic power leveling, many food safety incidents occurred in recent years, are relevant here. Of course, over the years, food safety standards are not fully "remain firm". Many standard argument back on amendments. However, these new standardsDevelop, as a general question. The reason is simple: as the standards development participants need considerable expertise, this restriction into the relevant departments and enterprises, experts of "shut the habit". ����Such standard-setting process, not only deprived the public of the right, the right to participate, also gave the public a "Maoni" conjecture of space. Over the years, whenever the public questionsFood safety standards are too low swtor power leveling, there is always a voice called for standard setting pay attention to the national conditions applicable. This view is not wrong in a strict sense, but sometimes it seems irrelevant. In fact, no one knows a bite to eat in a fat man, will also respect the Chinese "developing" a reality. Is unacceptable to the public, from melamine incident to lean, and already many food safety standard"State" has nothing to do, should discard these backward China early in the development of food safety standards, in reality these outdated standards were "peach blossom was still smiling spring breeze". Therefore, public concern about food safety, and revitalize the credibility of food safety standards, cannot just respond briefly to the departments concerned should also be thinking about food safety standards are already behind the timesExhibition? Standard-setting is open and transparent? ����Whether the right to develop was "minorities", "a small number of enterprises" abduction? Only similar questions have been answered, and food safety standards don't become public anxiety, can also become a food safety firmly "firewall".